Coup plotters are preparing the ground for invalidation of POTUS, tied to eruption into chaos, long term street violence, clashes, burning, lawlessness, and breakdown of national services that will lead to loss of power, gas, food, and other necessities.
We must not underestimate the bad character of depraved coup plotters and their collaborators. By their actions and choices we know they are degenerates whose consciences are hard. They are power-hungry narcissistic liars, thieves, pedophiles, assassins, adrenochrome drinkers, child sex slavers, Luciferians, haters, and vicious vengeance seekers.
We can expect no mercy from such deeply corrupted bad characters. In fact, we must steel ourselves and prepare for the worst while praying the Lord’s will be done. @SpiritedIrish
Eric Schwalm on X
Recordings and documents released by the account DataRepublican on X show former USAID officials, retired officers, and associated networks establishing private criteria for declaring the federal government illegitimate. They identify triggers that include certain election investigations and any use of the Insurrection Act against organized protests. Once a trigger occurs, the participants would treat existing federal authority as void and would expect governors to coordinate structural changes in its place. The materials can be presented to aligned political factions as an effort directed at one administration. The operational effect of the criteria, however, would interrupt the currency settlement, staffing arrangements, fuel coordination, and payment streams that currently allow basic national functions to continue from one day to the next. Success would therefore extend far beyond a change in executive leadership and would tear apart the everyday systems residents rely upon for light, water, waste removal, food purchases, and housing support.
The Difference Between the Political Framing and the Actual Mechanisms
Participants on the recordings discuss the triggers in composed language and appear satisfied with the completed framework. Ordinary residents across the country received no notice of the sessions, which took place in suburban locations outside Washington, and they held no opportunity to examine the criteria before the group treated them as finished. The element that can be communicated to supportive factions centers on opposition to a particular president. The mechanisms described in the documents do not remain limited to that opposition. Federal authority currently underpins acceptance of the dollar in ordinary transactions, the cross-state arrangements that deliver fuel to power plants, the supply of chemicals and continuous oversight required for water and sewage treatment, and the regular deposits that support food assistance for roughly forty million people and rental costs for about ten million people. Declaring that authority invalid would halt the movements that residents now observe each day when a switch produces light, when water arrives through pipes, and when waste is carried away for processing. The planning materials contain no description of how plant staffing, fuel contracts, chemical deliveries, or payment clearing would be maintained once the federal layer is set aside.
Evidence from Earlier Efforts That Produced Disruption Without Independent Recovery
The same networks previously supported actions that removed or collapsed governing capacity in other countries, and the outcomes of those actions demonstrate what follows when basic functions are interrupted without prepared replacements. After the removal of Saddam Hussein, authorities disbanded the Iraqi army and applied de-Baathification rules that excluded experienced administrators from returning to ministries. Within weeks, seventeen of twenty-one ministries lacked staff and operational records. Water treatment, electrical distribution, payroll processing, and hospital supply chains ceased. Armed groups then controlled remaining fuel and local stocks through direct possession. In Afghanistan, prior administrative and payment systems collapsed so rapidly that continuity disappeared. Color-revolution campaigns in Georgia and Ukraine, which received support from overlapping democracy-assistance organizations, developed detailed arrangements for protests and initial public statements. They developed no equivalent arrangements for tax collection, fuel distribution, pharmaceutical supply, or utility operation. None of these countries restored reliable daily services through the efforts of the groups that had pressed for the change. Where partial stabilization later occurred, it depended on funding, technical assistance, security presence, and administrative support that came in substantial part from the United States federal government. The individuals now advancing domestic criteria therefore propose to disable the same institution that supplied the principal external means of limited recovery in the cases they previously advanced.
The Day After the Criteria Leave Entirely Undescribed
If the privately developed triggers were treated as effective, federal payments supporting food purchases and housing costs would stop clearing. Grocery distributors that maintain limited on-site inventories because replenishment trucks arrive on regular schedules would halt those deliveries once they could no longer confirm payment sources or fuel availability, and retail shelves would empty within days. Landlords who depend on the federal portion of housing-voucher rents to service their mortgages would lose that income and would encounter no remaining law-enforcement capacity capable of conducting large-scale evictions, with the result that most would cease maintenance and eventually stop appearing at the properties. Water and sewage treatment plants that require steady electrical power, chemical inputs, and on-site personnel would lose reliability as soon as interstate fuel and payment arrangements fractured. Clinics that process Medicaid and Department of Veterans Affairs claims would exhaust supplies of medicines such as insulin and would lose staff members who were no longer receiving compensation. Pay for military personnel, National Guard members, and state police would end, leaving the governors identified in the planning documents with the ability to issue statements and conduct coordination calls but without compensated forces willing to deploy from armories in order to control road intersections, fuel distribution points, or medical supply sites. Outstanding obligations on the national debt would remain in force, because creditors would not cancel repayment requirements on the basis of a private declaration that prior institutions were invalid. Foreign suppliers would suspend shipments once they could no longer rely on acceptance of the currency or on the continued operation of ports. These conditions would occupy the period immediately following any successful application of the triggers. The released documents do not address them. They proceed from the decision to treat federal authority as illegitimate directly to an assumed process of rearrangement under governors, without identifying the means by which power plants would remain staffed, water would continue to be treated, fuel would keep moving, or payments would continue to clear.
Why the Record and the Omission Remove Any Basis for Credibility
The participants visible in the released recordings have not previously managed the interval that follows the loss of a nation’s capacity to perform basic operating functions. Their supported efforts in other countries produced sharp and lasting interruptions in food supply, utilities, medical logistics, and public order, and the limited improvements that eventually appeared relied upon the United States federal government. They now advance criteria whose public framing can be accepted by factions opposed to one administration, while the content of those criteria would interrupt the systems that keep currency accepted, electrical power flowing, water treated, waste removed, and assistance payments clearing for tens of millions of people across the entire country. Residents who currently rely on the daily occurrence of those results would encounter their interruption. The planners’ prior record supplies no evidence that they possess the ability to prevent or manage such an interruption, and their current documents supply no plan for doing so. That combination of demonstrated past results and present omission establishes that they lack the credibility required to advance measures whose success would dismantle the basic operating fabric of the United States. The foreseeable destruction of everyday national functions, rather than the political framing of removing one president, is the concrete reason the privately developed approach should not be carried forward.