Hanne Herland, The Herland Report, 4/24
Dr. Richard Dawkins has spent his life tearing down the belief in the cultural Christian values that have been the pillars of strength in Western civilization.
He has been one of those white male, atheist fundamentalist intellectuals who have – with remarkable passion – belittled, bullied, rampantly attacked Christianity and its reverence of God in the complexity of nature, effectively denying the existence of the metaphysical dimension and its influence on the physical, material world.
The unbelievable stupidity of Richard Dawkins: In a recent interview with LBC, this architect of the contemporary mainstream evil caricature of who God is, the designer of the hatred against anything Christian left in our culture, this man has the audacity to state that he was “slightly horrified Ramadan is being promoted instead of Christian Easter,” writes Hanne Nabintu Herland, historian of religions, author, founder of The Herland Report. Latest book: The Billionaire World. How Marxism Serves the Elite, available on Amazon here. The article first appeared at WND.
This is the very same man who for generations have demonized and twisted the message of the ancient Holy Books, calling God a sex-obsessed tyrant, and actively pushing for the purging of anything religious.
This arrogant atheist missionary now states that “we are a culturally a Christian country” and again says, “I call myself a cultural Christian.” So, in his opposition of Islam this delusional man is suddenly a Christian, after all?
The unbelievable stupidity of Richard Dawkins: Dr. Dawkins seems surprised that Islam takes dominion in the West. Which powers did he think would dominate whenChristian compassionate spiritualism is forcefully removed by the relentless work of atheist apostles like himself? His own raging revolt against God’s order in the traditional Western religion is about to succeed completely. Of course, Islam fills the spiritual vacuum.
His assumptions about the metaphysical world are quite well summed up in his notoriously destructive work The God Delusion, in which he states that God almost certainly does not exist.
This he determines with the utmost demonic pride, he who speaks of biological science and empiricism, yet determines that there is little probability of a Creator, based entirely on his own subjective perception.
The unbelievable stupidity of Richard Dawkins: Or has this culturally destructive atheist, this influencer of New Atheism, travelled beyond the edges of the universe in order to examine whether God is there? Is he able to determine empirically that there is no Godoutside the scope of this universe?
Or, can he scientifically prove that man’s heart, his innermost being, cannot be in touch with the celestial Spirit of God, who by the way exists outside of the realm of the empirical. Scientific hypothesis can only empirically prove that which exists in the material dimension.
So, this little man wants to disprove the metaphysical by applying empiricist methods that only describe the material dimension. He finds biological evolution more probable than creation, even if Darwinists never have been able to prove anything more than mutations within a species.
Darwinism is a faith – belief not based on empirical evidence – like any other. Evolution from one species to another has never been observed while it was happening, and therefore non-verifiable. It has never evolved beyond an unprovable theory. So, while he warns of anti-scientific fairytales as a great evil, he should be sure to include his own.
Dr. Dawkins, who arrogantly only operates in the low dimension of empiricism, who cannot even add ten years to the length of his own life, has preached that “God is dead” to generations and inserted nihilist hopelessness, emptiness and lovelessness into our century. For without God’s justice, His metaphysical love for the physical human kind and promise of a world after the current calamity, what is there to hope for?
What does the 83 year old Dr. Hawkins hope for after his own death? Does he expect to meet demons or angels? Does he actually dare to bet on nothingness, he who has not been able to prove anything regarding this topic?
As Dr. Dawkins joins Karl Marx, Friedrich Nietzsche, Sigmund Freud, Auguste Comte and other white male, ignorant Western atheists who were hellbent on tearing down the respect for traditional values, he points out that the Christian faith is a delusion.
The unbelievable stupidity of Richard Dawkins: From this “delusional” Christianideals stem groundbreaking values such as the belief in natural human rights, equality regardless of race, gender or social standing, the abolition of slavery, individual rights to own and control the fruit of one’s own labor, an economic system based on trustworthiness and accountability where private property rights, Christian moral standards and the separation of powers form the basis for stability and growth.
Naturally, the effect of willfully creating a burning hatred against Christianity in the general public and in the mainstream media, Dr. Dawkins has greatly contributed to the current Western collapse and disintegration of society.
Hanne Nabintu Herland is a historian of religions and bestselling author.
Dawkins must be one of those leftists who always think they’re the smartest ones in the room. That’s just the outcome of their huge vanity which makes them world class jerks.
And I didn’t know there were different degrees of horrified, such as “slightly horrified”. There’s being mortified, or appalled, or shocked, or dismayed, or shocked and dismayed which could apply better. (lol!)
So, can one who’s renounced God and Christianity be a cultural Christian? The nearest approximation I see is one who’s been in a Christian milieu but never became one.
It was in fact Christian culture that allowed the blessing of freedom of speech and he should be thankful and grateful. Islamists would never tolerate him renouncing Allah, would they? He’d be a silenced atheist.
Of course any leftist would approve his inanities since they’re the same.
Dawkin’s “slightly horrified” comment reminds me of those clinics that were once called Minor Emergency clinics. After a while it became known that no life-threatening emergency could be minor. A visit to the clinic could require prompt, urgent care but not be a life-threatening emergency. So the “minor” was dropped and they became, I think, Urgent Care clinics. Whereas a real emergency would require a visit to a hospital E.R..
No, one can’t be horrified in a minor way.