JD Hall, May 21, 2026
There are few experiences more destabilizing than discovering you’ve been lied to by those in positions of authority. Most Americans have experienced being told that certain subjects belonged entirely to the diseased world of “conspiracy theory,” only to discover later that reality had been heavily edited for their protection. The problem is, once people realize they have been lied to repeatedly, they begin reopening every forbidden filing cabinet in the country, including some cabinets respectable society desperately wants padlocked forever. That is how old stereotypes, ancient tropes, and dangerous books suddenly return from the dead.
In late July 2024, nine Israeli soldiers were arrested for sodomizing an innocent Palestinian man at Sde Teiman, and it became a major international news story. Ultimately, only five were charged for the rape because four of them only held riot shields to obstruct the scene from view, so no one could see what was happening (apparently, it’s not a crime to assist gang rape in Israel). Netanyahu responded by claiming it was “a modern-day blood libel” and likened the media coverage to the Holocaust, which, to be honest, is such a predictable response that Polymarket wouldn’t take bets because no one would wager against it. Ultimately, Israel deported the man after he got out of the hospital from a lengthy stay in critical condition because they ruptured his large intestine, then forbade him from returning to Israel, and dropped the charges against the guards because the victim was not available to testify. Netanyahu called the guards “heroes,” and they’re now treated like national celebrities. The prosecutor was so angered by the cover-up that she released the surveillance footage, and she’s been arrested and charged with whatever crime it is to not participate in a sodomy cover-up.
Anyway, two days ago, I saw a video of Jonathan Pollard in a webcast interview come across my X feed. He’s impossible not to recognize immediately, because he’s a less attractive version of Danny DeVito’s rendition of the Penguin from Tim Burton’s Batman. Pollard is the spy who spent 30 years in the Federal pen for selling our nuclear targets to Israel, who, in turn, gave them to Russia. For the first time since his release in 2015, Pollard had a new, never-before-mentioned accusation, which is that ten American prison guards had sodomized him while he was in custody. He also alleged that all ten died in the Pentagon on 9/11, and said it was God paying them back. It was an absurd accusation with no evidence or corroboration, and no one in the media took it seriously because it was an obvious attempt at distracting the press from covering the eerily similar Sde Teiman rape. It didn’t work, precisely because it was both absurd and obvious.
Just to remind you, when Pollard was arrested for spying on Israel’s behalf, he admitted to doing it, and issued a statement claiming that every American Jew should put Israel above the United States, and that he wasn’t sorry in the slightest. Only recently, Pollard again publicly encouraged all Jews with American security clearances to spy on Israel’s behalf. That was a few months prior to being warmly welcomed into the U.S. embassy by Ambassador Mike Huckabee, who lobbied for Pollard’s release years before his sentence was up. Huckabee excused the meeting because Pollard wanted to stop in to say thank you. When Pollard was released from prison, he didn’t have to wait for a prisoner transport, and Israel didn’t have to send a plane. He had an important appointment with PM Benjamin Netanyahu on the runway, who met him personally on the runway to give him a state-sponsored hero’s welcome. They rolled out the red carpet for Pollard, and best of all, he didn’t have to fly coach, and Israel didn’t have to buy him a ticket. He flew on the private luxury jet owned by American billionaire casino heiress Miriam Adelson.
Adelson is filthy rich, even for a Jewess. Her late husband made his fortune in the casino and vice industry. She’s a dual citizen of the U.S. and Israel, and was Donald Trump’s top campaign donor. When Trump spoke at the Israeli Knesset, he said out loud that Adelson, who was watching from the observatory, loved Israel more than America, while she glowed with the recognition. On the campaign trail in 2024, Trump admitted – again, out loud – that her massive spending on his candidacy purchased her favors, and that she called daily to ask for favors for Israel, and that on account of her giving, he gave her what she wanted. ›He once joked that her husband, Sheldon, was so persistent in asking for stuff on behalf of Israel that he would “come in through the windows.” At one point, Sheldon was on record saying that his “biggest regret” was having ever served in the U.S. military rather than the IDF. And in their spare time, scheduling their plane to do shuttle runs for a man who gave American nuclear secrets to foreign countries who gave it to our greatest enemy.
That’s also the woman who purchased a Congressman from Kentucky for a mere $ 32 million.
Miriam Adelson might look like a wealthy grandmother who’d yell at the waitress because the receipt suggested a tip, but in reality, she is one of the most powerful political operators in the United States without most Americans recognizing her name. She is at the center of the political operation that helped destroy Thomas Massie, who is, hands down, one of the most constitutionally minded congressmen in our lifetime, perhaps second only to, or tied with, Ron Paul. Her money and donor network helped fuel the most expensive congressional primary in American history after Massie became unreliable on Israel.
Adelson pledged millions and delivered on it, and she roused AIPAC-aligned donors to route contributions through various channels and third-party structures to maximize pressure against Massey, and the Democrat funding apparatus was retooled in this race to oust the Republican incumbent on behalf of a Republican primary challenger, whose only known political position was that he left the GOP when Trump won in 2016 and returned when he left in 2020. A former Navy SEAL, Trump referred to his opponent, Ed Gallrein, as “straight out of central casting” and even bragged that he had no real public positions, so he was fairly untouchable. Gallrein turned down every debate challenge from Massey – practically unheard of for a challenger – and spent the campaign as far away from both the voters and the cameras as possible, more hidden away than Biden in his last two presidential campaigns.
Israel apologists allege that the Jews only helped get out Gallrein’s message, but as explained, he didn’t have one. It was a shake-down of an 8-term congressman and one of the most popular in Kentucky’s history. In the end, the entire Neo-Con War Machine, Beltway establishment, and Washington insiders would pound Massey for months, all funded with a Jewish war chest designated for destroying the man who was vocal about AIPAC’s control of Washington, which they claimed was an antisemitic trope. To prove that Jews don’t control Washington, they primaried Thomas Massie and destroyed him with deceptive advertising that was beyond the pale of deception and below the belt. Irony hasn’t been this fully on display since Kanye said the Jews controlled banking, and to punish him, he was debanked and financially ruined to the tune of one billion lost dollars within a week.
I did an article at NXR entitled Big Jew: Understanding the Jewish Lobby’s 80-Year Control of Washington, and I don’t mean to repeat it here. I’m sure you’re quite aware of the allegations made about AIPAC’s, Israel’s and the entire Israel Lobby’s control over American politics going back decades. That article will give you a run down of other incidents exactly like Massey’s, in which Israel’s vast financial wealth is employed to destroy the rare politician who stands up to them, an effective example and warning against anyone else who does the same. As Admiral Thomas Moorer – the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, as well as the only Navy officer to serve as commander both of the Pacific and Atlantic fleets, said in a 1983 interview…
“I’ve never seen a President, I don’t care who he is, stand up to them. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn’t writing anything down. If the American people understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our citizens don’t have any idea what goes on.”
The Israel Lobby spends a fortune each year that would boggle your mind on convincing us that every person who alleges Jews exercise undue influence to control and/or manipulate the government of whatever nation they reside in, in favor of Jewish interests and to the detriment of their own interests, is an insane person, a bad human being, and the first person since Adolf Hitler to make such outrageous, unrealistic, absurd claims. That’s no exaggeration, because I’ve exposed how they do it for you. I’ve written about Project 545, which spends 145 million each year manipulating AI answers and search engine results, primarily in America. I’ve written about their 150 million a year in an evangelical religious influence campaign through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Israeli Tourism Ministry in partnership with the Friends of Zion and fake ministries in the U.S. masquerading as legitimate Christian outreach. I’ve written that Israel spends roughly the same amount as the Soviet Union did at its height on its Active Measures propaganda efforts, but it’s spent almost entirely on the U.S., while the Soviets had to spread that out to half the world.
The entire point of all that spent money – and all of that is just the tip of the iceberg – is to make you think the one guy who comes along and makes that case every few years is an anomaly, a lone wolf schizophrenic, a Hitler wannabe who has come up with some bizarre, never-been-heard-before cockamamie theory. The problem at the moment is that we are rising up everywhere simultaneously. They’re trying their damndest to besmirch Tucker and Candace to make examples of them, as a force multiplier, to produce a “chilling effect” so others who feel the same way suppress that urge to speak out and keep it to themselves. We are on the precipice of an Emperor’s New Clothes situation, and they can feel it, and the dams are breaking.
Imagine you asked me, “JD, what’s the one thing we can do right now, strategy-wise, to make that Emperor’s New Clothes moment come sooner, what would it be?”
I’d tell you this: We must get the public to understand that these accusations are not only not new, isolated, or rare, but the allegation that Jews have a historic pattern of using their disproportionate wealth, power, and influence to gain a measure of control over the nations where they reside to benefit their interests to the detriment of the interests of the majority culture. In other words, I’d tell you a chief priority would be informing the public that this claim characterized as crazy, rare, or new has been made repeatedly throughout the centuries, by almost nation where Jews reside. If someone wants to believe that’s all a coincidence – and some would – then fine. I can’t fix stupid. But at least then, they have the information necessary to free themselves of the brainwashing if they are so inclined.
In light of that, I bring your attention to Henry Ford.
HENRY FORD
Moorer, above, made the claim that Israeli interests have significant control over the U.S. government in 1983. The others I listed in the NXR article linked above also made the claim in the early 2000s, in the 1990s, the 1980s, the 1970s, the 1960s and onward. But one prominent American made the allegation more than one-hundred years ago.
In 1920, Ford published a series of articles in his Dearborn Independent newspaper, later compiled into four volumes called The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem. Type that title into any search engine or AI chatbot, and you will be told within seconds that it is antisemitic propaganda built on fabricated lies from the Russian Secret Police, that it heavily influenced the Nazis, that Ford later recanted and apologized, and that decent human beings forget about, because it causes Holocausts, and if you’re not careful, you might cause the next one. You will not be given a summary of its specific claims or invited to evaluate them. You will be told it is hateful, fabricated, and an antisemitic fever dream. And that strategy has worked to keep it suppressed and vilified for more than one hundred
PROTOCOLS OF ZION
Ford leaned heavily on a document called the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. I don’t have time or space to give you a full debrief here, but I’ve put the full explanation of the document, the official narrative, and reasons why the official narrative is propagandic poppycock into an Intel Drop for Patreon Supporters because it would throw my whole article off and lose the forest for the trees.
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was published in a Russian newspaper by a hardline pro-Tsar monarchist and claimed to be minutes from the First Zionist Congress held in Basel, Switzerland, in 1897, that laid out plans for a Jewish ethnostate. That was a real meeting, that really did take place, which really did lay out global plans to build a Jewish ethnostate somewhere in the world. Dispensationalism didn’t exist yet, so establishing an ethnostate in Palestine under the category of “prophecy fulfillment” wasn’t on the agenda, and in the beginning, they weren’t focused exclusively on Palestine. But the goal of the meeting was to lay out plans to capitalize on the vast wealth and political influence of world Jewry to beg, borrow, or steal a plot of land somewhere in the world for a Jewish ethnostate. The alleged minutes also showed a plot to supposedly subvert Christian civilization through control of banking, media, revolution, finance, and governments.
According to the official narrative, the minutes were plagiarized from a 1864 French satirical piece by Maurice Joly, titled Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, which criticized Napoleon’s nephew, who later became president of France. Other portions were allegedly stitched together from older European conspiracy literature and “Tsarist political propaganda.” Most historians claim it was likely assembled by someone with connections to the Russian Secret Police to discredit the revolutionary movements to overthrow the Tsar that would later become the Bolshevik Revolution, and to associate it with the Jews. This was an easy task because the Jews did, in fact, lead those revolutionary movements. Their theory is that they wanted the Jews to look more radical than they were.
The Protocols became famous after the Bolshevik Revolution, when anti-communists across Europe and America figured out that Jews were playing a prominent role in the Communist Revolution, and people began to widely believe that Jews had a disproportionate level of power and influence not only in Russia, but all over the world. With the advance of global media, people in different nations all over the world began to report similar tales of Jews instigating radical movements to undermine the nations in which they resided. It should be noted that this is hardly conspiratorial, and much academic work has been done, much of it by Jews themselves, to explain why that’s the case.
These radical, Jewish-led or disproportionately Jewish movements include the Bolshevik Revolution, the Hungarian Soviet Revolution of 1919, various radical movements in the United States (labor unions, the ACLU, and NAACP and numerous race riots, the Hollywood Ten, etc), the Frankfurt School (Cultural Marxism), the Sexual Revolution (Hirschfield, Reich, etc), the more radical components of the Psychological Revolution, the transgender movement, the Communist movement in Germany, Poland, and Romania, the Feminist movement, the Popular Front in France, Che Guevara in Cuba and Boliva (his entire inner circle was Jewish), and the Communist movemet in South Africa.
People all over the world wanted an explanation for why every time there was a radical movement disrupting their nation, toppling regimes, and causing societal disruptions, Jews were at the center of it. It was hard not to notice. The apologetic method against these claims is to point out that almost none of these movements were majority Jewish. That’s absolutely true, and because Jews have never exceeded more than a percentage or two of the world population, it’s unreasonable to think any movement could be majority Jewish. But that’s hardly dissuading the observation that the movements are led by, financed by, or engineered by Jews, regardless of the overall demographical makeup of the movement’s worker bees.
The Protocols gave people something to hold on to and say, “This explains it.” Because the Jewish diaspora was global, and the radical movements all over the world had Jews at their epicenter, people naturally assumed there was a coordinated global conspiracy. Protocols made sense to people, so it grew quickly, as a frantic worldwide media campaign happened concurrently, debunking the document long before the age of the factchecker.
Regarding the official narrative that the Protocols are a forgery, I don’t believe that case is nearly as cut-and-dried as they would like it to seem, and I would encourage you to check out the Intel Drop on that here. Despite it being a giant can of worms, the point is that The International Jew drew from the Protocols to some extent, so the official narrators discount everything in The International Jew on that account. But the reason the Protocols seemed legitimate to practically the entire world was that they resonated with what people were experiencing in their own nations.
The reason why so many people read and disseminated Ford’s book is that it resonated with what they, too, had seen and experienced in the United States. And frankly, if you read Protocols today, it would look like the spitting image of what we witnessed in Kentucky on Tuesday.
THE INTERNATIONAL JEW
Ford disseminated The International Jew through The Dearborn Independent and The International Jew, helping spread the text globally during the 1920s. The official narrative says that Ford’s reliance on Protocols as a primary source is a serious flaw that contaminates several of his most dramatic claims – specifically his assertion that a Jewish super-government has effectively replaced many national governments, and his claim that American presidents are selected and controlled through blackmail over hidden scandals.
Sound familiar? Yeah, spookily familiar. That’s the first thing that hits you when you read The International Jew. The claims circulating today regarding Jewish or Israeli international influence are nothing new.
Ford alleged that Jewish financial networks operated across national borders as a unified interest bloc, deploying money into host nation politics to purchase outcomes favorable to Jewish collective interests regardless of their party. Today, Big Jew spent thirty-two million dollars in a single Kentucky congressional primary to remove one congressman who questioned military aid to Israel. It was a financial record. The record was previously held in the race to oust Jamal Bowman, a far-Left Democrat, when Big Jew spent 22 million to oust him. What does Massey, one of the most conservative congressmen to ever serve in the House, have in common with Jamal Bowman, one of the most liberal congressmen ever to serve in the House? Both criticized Israel, and both had Big Jew take them out in districts that had previously supported them with landslide popularity, proving that Big Jew is strong enough to defeat overwhelming grassroots support every time.
Ford alleged that the politician who gets removed fastest in American political life is the one who questions things emanating from Jewish sources. The three most expensive congressional primaries in American history – Bowman in 2024, Bush in 2024, Massie in 2026 – were all AIPAC operations against incumbents whose offense was insufficient deference to Israeli interests. Three for three, consecutive cycles, same network, same mechanism, publicly documented.
Ford alleged that campaign finance investigations never go deep enough to trace the international sources of political money. AIPAC has operated for decades as an unregistered foreign agent, successfully avoiding the Foreign Agents Registration Act that governs every other lobbying operation working on behalf of foreign government interests on American soil, through Republican and Democratic administrations alike, without serious challenge. JFK tried to make them register for FARA, and he was assassinated. RFK tried to make them register, and he was assassinated. Senator Fulbright tried to make them register, and they dumped record-setting cash to successfully defeat him, despite – like Massey – winning every election he ever had in his district up until then. Given that Charlie Kirk had told his friends that Israel’s influence in American politics was too strong and too unaccountable, it makes you wonder if he is dead only because they couldn’t primary him.
Ford alleged that the charge of antisemitism functions not as a genuine defense against hatred but as a political silencing mechanism, deployed strategically to end arguments rather than answer them. David Ben Gurion first complained of “antisemitism” in 1942 when Britain accused Israeli terrorists of weapons trafficking. Israel accused the Americans of “antisemitism” during the prosecutions of Jewish Egyptians caught trying to blow up American targets in the Lavon Affair. President Ford was threatened with being labeled an antisemite if he went hard after answers following Israel’s attacks on the U.S.S. Liberty. President Nixon was threatened with being labeled an antisemite for withholding aid at the beginning of the 1973 Yom Kippur War. And that’s still their favorite and most-used tactic today, and Ford called this out in 1921.
Ford alleged that Jewish advisers inserted themselves as indispensable counselors to Gentile governments, particularly in moments of national emergency, and that the governments became structurally dependent on that counsel in ways that served Jewish interests over national interests. Today, every American administration, regardless of party, fills its senior foreign policy positions with figures whose primary ideological commitment is to the US-Israel relationship. The list of senior officials with direct institutional ties to AIPAC, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and allied organizations is not a short one. This is not hidden. It is published on their own websites as a feature rather than a bug.
Ford alleged that Jewish financial power in America was concentrated in banking, media, and the legal apparatus, and that this concentration gave Jewish interests structural leverage over American politics disproportionate to their numbers. The overrepresentation of Jewish figures in the senior leadership of American financial institutions, media companies, and legal structures is documented, acknowledged by Jewish historians and sociologists themselves, and explained by the same structural factors (suburbanization, literacy, exclusion from landed and military aristocracy, etc.) that explain their overrepresentation in radical movements. Whether the explanation fully accounts for the degree of concentration remains an open question.
Ford alleged that the press would not cover Jewish influence operations honestly because the press itself was subject to Jewish financial leverage. The documented facts, including the donor histories, the cross-party money flows, the FARA question, and the pattern in each campaign cycle, received a fraction of the coverage that a comparable operation by any other foreign-linked interest network would have generated. The coverage that did appear was largely framed around Trump’s endorsement of Gallrein rather than around the Israeli-interest money that actually drove the operation.