Intro: First wave feminism identified Jesus Christ as the Head of the hated male patriarchy. Therefore they rejected Him and turned to the occult, mainly witchcraft, spiritism, and other occult crafts. This hatred of Jesus Christ is the black heart of ideological feminism’s revolutionary rage and rejection of all that is natural to the spirit of women–soft hearts, nurturing, comfort in times of pain and fear, motherhood, babies, children, fathers, teaching, and welcoming homes. In their discontent, rage, and rebellion today’s Woke narcissistic feminists murder their babies, children, and even their husbands in furtherance of their autonomy and liberation. Feminism has hit rock bottom. @Linda
“Feminism is evil and toxic, it is destroying our society. Men are awesome, it’s not their fault most women stopped fulfilling their womanly duties. These two sentences make me a woman hater, apparently.” Alyona on X Russian-American
Brivael Le Pogam on X
This provocative post has a lot of truth in it.
But to understand why, you have to go back to the origins of feminism. We were told a nice story: oppressed women breaking free. The reality is more interesting.
The first wave of feminism wasn’t born on farms or in factories. It was born in drawing rooms. Seneca Falls in 1848, the British suffragettes: bourgeois women, educated, with household staff. Nobody asked the Breton peasant woman working the fields next to her husband what she thought. She was already living complementarity, out of necessity.
Then came the theory. In 1884, Engels published The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. His thesis: the monogamous family is a product of private property, and the wife is the first proletarian. To bring down capitalism, you have to dissolve the family. That’s not an interpretation, it’s written in black and white.
In 1917, the Bolsheviks put it into practice. Alexandra Kollontai championed free love and state-raised children. Near-instant divorce, marriage emptied of meaning. Combined with the chaos of the civil war, the result was millions of abandoned children roaming the streets. It was so catastrophic that Stalin himself reversed course in 1936 and restored the family. When even Stalin thinks you’ve gone too far, you should ask yourself some questions.
And here’s where it gets fascinating: the market had exactly the same interest. In 1929, Edward Bernays, Freud’s nephew and the father of public relations, paid young women to smoke in the middle of New York’s Easter Parade. He rebranded cigarettes as “torches of freedom.” Women’s liberation became a sales pitch.
Revolutionaries on one side, advertisers on the other. Two supposedly opposing camps, one shared target: the family. Because a united family is autonomous. It produces, it passes things down, it protects itself, it resists. Isolated individuals consume more and obey better. Divide and conquer, anthropological edition.
The genius of the operation was capturing a legitimate idea. Equal dignity between men and women is self-evident. But it was turned into a war between the sexes, where men are oppressors and motherhood is alienation. Equality got confused with interchangeability.
Today, a lot of women are doing the math. They were sold freedom and got the double shift, loneliness at 40, fertility sacrificed to a career. A lot of men too: their role was taken away without anything offered in its place.
The rest is already written. The pendulum is swinging back. Complementarity is coming back in a big way. Not as a step backward, but as a rediscovery: men and women aren’t competitors. They’re two halves of the same project.
Ideologies that bet against human nature always end up losing. Communism learned that. Radical feminism is learning it now.