Children will be indoctrinated to believe that they are begotten by the divine state, exist as a resource for the divine state, and live or die (be sacrificed) for the benefit of the divine state. SpiritedIrish on X
Andrew Bridgen on X
They were always coming for the children, the Government deciding what’s in a child’s best interest is beyond parody, Children must not become the slaves of the state. No to child digital ID.
Benonwine on X
Listen to this it will scare you. Labour are coming for OUR CHILDREN.
May God Above help them. The same kind of people that Labour has have been doing it here too, which is breaking up families. That’s a Stalinist/Leninist idea.
And it’s the same ideas found in the lyrics of that Beatle tune “Imagine” where it says, “Imagine no possessions.. I wonder if you can. Nothing to kill or die for.. and no religion too. ~ No hell below us.. above us only sky. ~ Imagine all the people.. living life in peace (?????).. You-u-u may think I’m a dreamer.. but I’m not the only one.. I hope someday you will join us.. and the world will be as one”. I still remember most of it.
That sounds like the One World government some aspire to today, with the addition of breaking down national borders.
Has MSN been following this blog? I ask that because it seems too coincidental that today’s featured articles on MSN are on John Lennon’s birthday which focus on his song “Imagine”, even to quoting the same lyrics I did above. And they give him glowing praise for singing that. That’s the sanctimonious Godless atheists talking at MSN.
“Imagine” is just that, an imaginary utopia that exists only within the imagination. In this imaginary utopia, fallen, evil mankind lives at peace with all other fallen evil humans, each one fully engaged in doing whatever his, her, or ‘its’ sins are. Is it your unholy desire to rape children and cut them up with knives because inflicting pain and suffering is your poison? Or is to possess the property of our sinners and seize it for yourself, using brutal methods if necessary? Yes, as we can see, “Imagine” is really hell on earth.
You’re right, it’s too simplistic. For example, it mentions possessions. Are these manufactured possessions and who manufactures them? Do they just hand them out for free? And where and how do these manufacturers acquire their resources? Forced labor?
No religion? What’s that about, evolution? No guidance about what’s right or wrong? Everybody’s right when nobody’s wrong?
It’s downright silly primary school stuff.
Come to think of it, it’s exactly like primary school kids. They have no possessions because their parents own them. They have no religion either because their parents do that.
I’ve concluded that John Lennon’s song “Imagine” is indeed purely imaginary, as in shallow, childish, and of no substance.
The Beatles had other purely imaginary songs such as “Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds” and “Yellow Submarine”. In viewing them all together, we can conclude that “Imagine” was indeed purely imaginary and not an intended ideology.
I’d further conclude that The Beatles were known for their clowning around and not to be taken seriously. An American group, The Monkees, continued doing that in their TV show.
The Beatles just composed love songs and flights of fancy. Nothing semantic.