Joanna Gillan, Ancient Origins
Out of the many incredible artifacts that have been recovered from sites in Iraq where flourishing Sumerian cities once stood, few have been more intriguing than the Sumerian King List. An ancient manuscript originally recorded in the Sumerian language, the Sumerian King List is a register of the kings of Sumer (ancient southern Iraq) from Sumerian and neighboring dynasties.
First Temple Period Ivory Plaques, From Bible, Found in Jerusalem
The list includes their names, supposed reign lengths, and the locations of “official” kingship. What makes the Sumerian King List so unique is the fact that it blends apparently mythical pre-dynastic rulers with historical rulers who are known to have existed in real life.
The first fragment of this rare and unique text, a 4,000-year-old cuneiform tablet , was found in the early 1900s by German-American scholar Hermann Hilprecht at the site of ancient Nippurand his results were published in 1906. Since Hilprecht’s discovery, at least 18 other exemplars of the king’s list have been found, most of them dating from the second half of the Isin Dynasty (c. 2017 to 1794 BC).
No two of these documents are identical. However, there is enough common material in all versions of the Sumerian King List to make it clear that they are derived from a single, “ideal” account of Sumerian history.
The Weld-Blundell Prism
Among all the examples of the Sumerian King List, the Weld-Blundell prism in the Ashmolean Museum cuneiform collection in Oxford represents the most extensive version, as well as the most complete copy of the Sumerian King List. The 8-inch-high (20.32 cm) prism contains four sides with two columns on each side.
It is believed that the Weld-Blundell prism originally had a wooden spindle going through its center so that it could be rotated and read on all four sides. It lists rulers from the antediluvian (“before the flood”) dynasties to the fourteenth ruler of the Isin Dynasty (ca. 1763 to 1753 BC).
The list is of immense value because it reflects very old traditions while at the same time providing an important chronological framework relating to the different periods of kingship in Sumeria. It even demonstrates remarkable parallels to accounts in Genesis.
The Ancient Civilization of Sumer
Sumer (sometimes called Sumeria), is the site of the earliest known civilization, located in the southernmost part of Mesopotamia between the Tigris and the Euphrates rivers, in the area that later became Babylonia and is now southern Iraq from around Baghdad to the Persian Gulf.
By the 3rd millennium BC, Sumer was the site of at least twelve separate city states, including Kish, Erech, Ur, Sippar, Akshak, Larak, Nippur, Adab, Umma, Lagash, Bad-tibira and Larsa. Each of these states comprised a walled city and its surrounding villages and land. Each city state worshiped its own deity, whose temple was the central structure of the city.
Political power originally belonged to the citizens, but, as rivalry between the various city states increased, each adopted the institution of kingship. The Sumerian King List records that eight kings reigned before a Great Flood. Afterwards, the list claims that various city-states and their dynasties of kings temporarily gained power over the others.
Sumer’s Mythical Past: Mythical Figures in the Sumerian King List
The Sumerian King List begins with the very origin of kingship, which is seen as a divine institution: “the kingship had descended from heaven.” The rulers in the earliest dynasties are represented as reigning fantastically long periods:
After the kingship descended from heaven, the kingship was in Eridug. In Eridug, Alulim became king; he ruled for 28800 years. Alaljar ruled for 36000 years. 2 kings; they ruled for 64800 years.
Some of the rulers mentioned in the early list, such as Etana, Lugal-banda and Gilgamesh, are mythical or legendary figures whose heroic feats are subjects of a series of Sumerian and Babylonian narrative compositions.
The early list names eight kings with a total of 241,200 years from the time when kingship “descended from heaven” to the time when “the Flood” swept over the land and once more “the kingship was lowered from heaven” after the Flood.
Interpretation of the Long Tenures of Early Kings
The amazingly long tenure of the early kings has provoked many attempts at interpretation. At one extreme is the complete dismissal of the astronomically large figures as “completely artificial” and the view that they are unworthy of serious consideration. At the other extreme, is the belief that the numbers have a basis in reality and that the early kings were indeed gods who were capable of living much longer than humans.
In between the two extremes is the hypothesis that the figures represent relative power, triumph or importance. For example, in ancient Egypt , the phrase “he died aged 110” referred to someone who lived life to the full and who offered an important contribution to society.
In the same way, the extremely reigns of the early kings may represent how incredibly important they were perceived as being in the eyes of the people. This doesn’t explain, however, why the periods of tenure later switched to realistic time periods.
Related to this perspective is the belief that although the early kings are historically unattested, this does not preclude their possible correspondence with historical rulers who were later mythicized. Some scholars, such as Harrison, have even sought to explain the figures through mathematical investigation and interpretation.
The Sumerian King List and its Relation to Genesis
Some scholars (e.g. Bryant G. Wood, 2003) have drawn attention to the fact that there are remarkable similarities between the Sumerian King List and accounts in Genesis. For example, Genesis tells the story of ‘the great flood’ and Noah’s efforts to save all the species of animals on Earth from destruction. Likewise, in the Sumerian King List there is discussion of a great deluge, where the text states that “the flood swept over the earth.”
The Sumerian King List provides a list of eight kings (some versions have 10) who reigned for long periods of time before the flood, ranging from 18,600 to 43,200 years. This is similar to Genesis 5, where the generations from Creation to the Flood are recorded. Interestingly, between Adam and Noah there are eight generations, just as there are eight kings between the beginning of kingship and the flood in the Sumerian King List.
After the flood, the King List records kings who ruled for much shorter periods of time. Thus, the Sumerian King List not only documents a great flood early in man’s history, but it also reflects the same pattern of decreasing longevity as found in the Bible – men had extremely long life spans before the flood and much shorter life spans following the flood.
The Sumerian King List truly is a perplexing mystery. Why would the Sumerians combine mythical rulers with actual historical rulers in one document? Why are there so many similarities with Genesis? Why were ancient kings described as ruling for thousands of years? These are just some of the questions that still remain unanswered after more than a century of research.
By Joanna Gillan
This brings to mind some intriguing questions, which can’t be answered either with the information available.
The first question is to note the striking dissimilarity between the pre-flood and post-flood environments. From our post-flood view, we see diseases which can run rampant and which can shorten lifespans for many. If the millennial-living kings were immune to like-shortening diseases, then they probably weren’t human.
The lifespans of those king’s subjects isn’t mentioned. Even assuming they could live hundreds of years without dying from disease, how could they ever have knowledge of, and then record, the millennial lifespans of those kings?
I’m stumped by this.
Then there’s the Sumerian knowledge of the Great Flood, which indicates they survived it to tell the tale.
It was Noah and his family who survived the flood and brought with them the knowledge of the preflood world. They passed this knowledge down to future generations.
Thank you, that’s how it would have to be done.
Furthermore the Sumerians were known for their heinous brutality such as impaling people on sharpened stakes through their anus. From this we can surmise that their kings were not of “divine” origin.
Due to a memory lapse, I forgot to mention that the above treatment was given to criminals.
One could argue that the present day Sumerians haven’t changed much: they’ll chop off your left hand for stealing or behead you or stone you to death for infidelity to their creed.
Then again, the Romans weren’t any kinder for impaling criminals to crosses with nails through their hands and feet.
I am amazed that these items have escaped the grasp of The Smithsonian, thus continuing to see the light of day and testify, in a way, to the reality of the biblical antediluvian account. Then again, I guess The Smithsonian would have to steal the entire planet in order to hide all the evidence, abounding everywhere in the “fossil record”, geological strata best explained by huge and widespread catastrophism, human footprints next to dinosaur footprints, and so on and so forth. I open my eyes and see the overwhelmingly brilliant and beautiful handiwork of God everywhere, and the man standing next to me sees only evolved pond scum… yet he desires to instilll his death-affirming belief in me for fear of the light. Now, which will I choose? The darkness of a lie, the misery of being evolved pond scum and ripe for WEF/UN enslavement, impoverishment and destruction, or the light of life, the knowledge of the truth, the true freedom of my soul and the confidence of eternal life in God’s eternal kingdom? Hmmm, tough one, that.
Beautiful life affirming response!