In his well researched text, “Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, & American Economics in the Progressive Era,”Thomas C Leonard reveals how deeply infatuated early progressives were to some dark, disturbing, evil ideas. They run the gamut from utopianism and sheer confidence in their own self-righteousness to eugenics (population control), race science (evolutionary biology), and the pantheist divinization of nature, history, genes, matter, evolutionary energies, and the ‘divine state. ‘
Progressives are pantheists who view the state as a divine instrument of a god-force or energy that works through it, thus the energy is,
“…the greatest power for good that existed among men and women.” (Dark Side of Progressivism Exposed: From Eugenics to ‘Race Science,’ Samuel Gregg, CNS News, Feb. 10, 2017)
Human-Hating Exterminators
“… civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world.” Descent of Man,” Charles Darwin, 1871
While Marxists are materialists and Progressives are pantheists who practice spiritual evolution, both are followers of Darwin and evil twins in many ways. For instance, Progressives exclude and even desire extermination of unwanted classes of people, such as white people, Christians, and Americans in general, while Marxists desired to exterminate,
“All the…large and small nationalities are destined to perish…in the revolutionary world storm... (A general war will) wipe out all…nations, down to their very names. The next world war will result in the disappearance from the face of the earth not only reactionary classes…but…reactionary peoples.” (“The Magyar Struggle,” Neue Rheinische Zeitung, Jan. 13, 1849)
In ‘America’s Ruling Class’ Angelo Codevilla details the rise of America’s progressive movement. As far back as the 1820s J.C. Calhoun, an early progressive, was reading in the best London journals that,
“…different breeds of animals and plants produce inferior or superior results, slave owners were citing the Negroes’ deficiencies to argue that they should remain slaves indefinitely. Lots of others were reading Ludwig Feuerbach’s rendition of Hegelian philosophy, according to which biblical injunctions reflect the fantasies of alienated human beings or, in the young Karl Marx’s formulation, that ethical thought is “superstructural” to material reality. By 1853, when Sen. John Pettit of Ohio called “all men are created equal” “a self-evident lie,” much of America’s educated class had already absorbed the “scientific” notion (which Darwin only popularized) that man is the product of chance mutation and natural selection of the fittest. Accordingly, by nature, superior men subdue inferior ones as they subdue lower beings or try to improve them as they please….As the 19th century ended, the educated class’s religious fervor turned to social reform: they were sure that because man is a mere part of evolutionary nature, man could be improved, and that they, the most highly evolved of all, were the improvers.” (America’s Ruling Class—and the Perils of Revolution, Codevilla, July/Aug. 2010, The American Spectator)
As the years passed and their numbers grew their narcissism inflated together with their distaste,
“…for common Americans. Believing itself “scientific,” this Progressive class sought to explain its differences from its neighbors in “scientific” terms. The most elaborate of these attempts was Theodor Adorno’s widely acclaimed The Authoritarian Personality (1948). It invented a set of criteria by which to define personality traits, ranked these traits and their intensity in any given person on what it called the “F scale” (F for fascist), interviewed hundreds of Americans, and concluded that most who were not liberal Democrats were latent fascists. This way of thinking about non-Progressives filtered down to college curricula. In 1963-64 for example, I was assigned Herbert McCloskey’s Conservatism and Personality (1958) at Rutgers’s Eagleton Institute of Politics as a paradigm of methodological correctness. The author had defined conservatism in terms of answers to certain questions, had defined a number of personality disorders in terms of other questions, and run a survey that proved “scientifically” that conservatives were maladjusted ne’er-do-well ignoramuses. “ (ibid)
Today’s narcissistic, self-righteous Progressive ruling class, from Boston to San Diego, is a God-and-human-hating confederacy formed by an ideological educational system that exposes them to the same ideologies and gives them remarkably uniform guidance, as well as tastes and habits:
” These amount to a social canon of judgments about good and evil, complete with secular sacred history, sins (against minorities and the environment), and saints. Using the right words and avoiding the wrong ones when referring to such matters — speaking the “in” language — serves as a badge of identity. Regardless of what business or profession they are in, their road up included government channels and government money because, as government has grown, its boundary with the rest of American life has become indistinct. Many began their careers in government and leveraged their way into the private sector. Some, e.g., Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner, never held a non-government job. Hence whether formally in government, out of it, or halfway, America’s ruling class speaks the language and has the tastes, habits, and tools of bureaucrats. It rules uneasily over the majority of Americans not oriented to government.”
The faith of America’s Progressive Ruling Class rests on three pillars of sand. The two most important are evolutionary biology (race science) and Darwinism. The third, an arrogant assumption of god-like superiority, is enabled and empowered by the first two. Codevilla summarizes this attitude as “we” are the best and brightest while the rest of Americans are unevolved humanoids, hence,
“…retrograde, racist, and dysfunctional unless properly constrained.”
Despite America’s pervasive spiritual, moral, and intellectual pathology most Americans still retain love of country and faith in God (more or less), thus some sense of right and wrong, while the Deep State Ruling Class are characterized by depraved consciences and evil animalistic minds who imagine themselves as gods. So far from being the rational, scientifically enlightened, morally and intellectually superior beings they imagine themselves to be, America’s Deep State and its confederates are superstitious depraved monsters whose distaste for common Americans long ago devolved into hatred that now rages out of control because deplorable “hominids” dared to rebel against their evil ‘betters’ and elect Donald Trump, who issued this ominous warning to his narcissistic Deep State enemies who tried twice to have Trump murdered: “I was the Hunted. Now I’m the HUNTER.”
Pride always precedes the fall of a bad man. Narcissism assures the bad man arrives down there all the quicker.
2025 @Linda Kimball
I guess we’ll never see any peace and good will toward men from these people who think they’re endowed by nature with the right to subjugate and/or exterminate all those they consider their inferiors. They’ll follow the law of the jungle where their might makes right.
Islam does that too but they disguise their might makes right as Allah’s will.
Truth and justice are alien to them both.
And the universities haven’t taught anyone how to think for themselves but rather indoctrinated about what to think – political correctness.
It’s utterly disgusting to me how senseless mankind can be. It used to be called brainwashing to have ideas that can’t be true but yet are believed, where reality is totally subjective and divorced from the truth.
There can never be true goodwill but only a pretense of goodwill from self-centered narcissists.
I agree. If Satan can deceive by impersonating an angel of light, then these wretched sinful narcissist evil-doers can also deceive by impersonating good-doers.
On that note, I expect that the wretched sinful Mohammed was tricked by Satan into believing he was the angel Gabriel. Mohammed’s followers believe that lie too.
The Bible says to test the spirits but Mohammed didn’t do that and neither did any who came after him. They would all be narcissistic evil-doers pretending to do good, calling it Allah’s will. No, it would be an unsaved narcissist’s will they’re following, and Satan’s. Don’t they act criminally and call it Allah’s will?
The universities will no doubt discourage open debate because they don’t want their political correctness to be shown as being incorrect, as being built on sand.
Bravo to Prof(?) Codevilla for keeping his wits about him throughout his attempted indoctrination, enough to reveal what those silly indoctrinators really are.