Raymond Ibrahim, Apr 2025
The strange hadith of the encounter between Muhammad and al-Zutt (convenient link provided by Jai & DoC: https://sunnah2.com/262) including the phrase “they began to ride the prophet of Allah” — appears in several Islamic texts, chief among them:
- مسند الإمام أحمد بن حنبل (Musnad al-Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, v. 3, p. 399, hadith# 3788).
- تاريخ مدينة دماسكوس إبن هبات الله (Tarikh Medina Damascus, Ibn Hibat Allah, v. 46, p. 461).
- نور الدين الهيثمي مجمع الزوائد ومنبع الفوائد (Mujma’ al-Zawa’id w Munbigh al-Fawa’d, Ibn Abi Bakr, v.8, p. 261).
- “They wounded me”: أخبار مكة الفاكهي (Akhbar Mecca, al-Fakahi, v. 4, p. 24).
- “The penis of al-Zutt never weakens”: كتاب التشبيهات لابن أبي عون (Kitab al-Tashibihat, Ibn Abi ‘Awn, v. 1, p.50).
- “Women, dogs, and donkeys cancel a man’s prayer”: مسند الإمام أحمد بن حنبل (Musnad al-Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, vol. 2, p. 2992).
- “A woman may be compared to a cow, horse, or camel—for all are ridden”: تفسير القرطبي الجامع لأحكام القرآن (Tafsir al-Qurtubi, v.15, p.172).
- “… a vagina that never tires and a penis that never weakens”: الدر المنثور السيوطي (al-Dur al-Manthur, al-Siyuti, v.1, p.211).
2022 article first mentioning this hadith: https://www.raymondibrahim.com/2022/0… Muslim responses to this hadith typically go as follows: 1) al-Zutt were Jinn, not humans; 2) The hadith is referencing the “Night of the Jinn,” when Muhammad reportedly preached the Koran to them; 3) Abdullah bin Mas’ud is on record saying that he was not with Muhammad on the Night of the Jinn: therefore, the hadith is weak (ضعيف) and likely fabricated. As discussed in this video, however, the earliest sources all depict al-Zutt as humans, meaning the night in question had nothing to do with the Jinn, and therefore the testimony of Abdullah — a chief and trusted transmitter of hadith — remains valid (the one argument raised against this hadith, that Abdullah was not present during the Night of the Jinn, becomes a moot point). Note: The special editing effects in this video were made by ivanlinkedin8@gmail.com
Note: I found a way to watch these YouTube videos without logging in, by just making minor program changes.
Mr Ibrahim makes a well-reasoned discourse which points out Islam’s falsehoods. It shows how Islam is false because it doesn’t lend itself to well-reasoned discourse. And that’s because there are no truths in it that can be resolved to reach a logical and truthful conclusion.
What Islam is the ravings of a lunatic with delusions of grandeur. Mohammed stole from existing religions such as Judaism and Christianity and added criminal elements (al-Zutt?) found in religions from other tribes, such as the symbol of the crescent moon.
He stole the appearance of the angel “Gabriel” from Christianity. Very often, sheiks claim to have the blood of Abraham, which could only come from being the ill-begotten sons of the slave woman Abraham has relations with.
If Islamists were to seek the truth, they’d never find it in Islam. Only Christianity can point to reason and truth. Mr. Ibrahim shows where there’s no truth to be found.
On another note, why would Mohammed consent to having carnal relations with beings who don’t quite fit the description of being neither human nor natural, beings who have no moral qualms yet? No prophet of God would do that, only an imposter of an imposter Allah would.
That explains that horrid immoral, degrading, and dehumanizing code of conduct found in Islam, hardly more than sexual bestiality.
Islam resembles Judaism in that it’s a packet of laws for sinners who are never forgiven for their trespasses. Islamic justice is served to them on this earth only, corporally. Their “heavenly” reward is also corporal, not spiritual. That’s the only reward the Devil can promise, isn’t it?