Teachings of Demons: The Aeon of Horus, Reign of God-Men, and End of the Christian God

“Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons,”    1 Tim 4:1

“The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness: only power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently. We are different from all the oligarchies of the past, in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites…We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means, it is an end…The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now do you begin to understand me?” O’Brien, in 1984, by George Orwell

The heart of the Party or Global Transhuman Big Brother is the pagan magician, a demonized man-god who imagines he has acquired powerful psychic powers and gnosis through actualization of the cosmic Divine Energy or Force within his own brain. (Dan. 11:38) Thus he creates his own world and meaning in every living moment out of his own divine consciousness.

In other words, since according to teachings of demons, the substance of God is distributed throughout all of the cosmos including the unconscious mind of man, then by means of self-induced trance states, brain-altering drugs, transcendental meditation and other magic ways, man can tap into the god-force within, thereby becoming a little god who controls matter because he controls mind. The physical world then, is an illusion because reality is inside the divine mind of the god-man.

This way of thinking is captured by Orwell in his book, “Nineteen Eighty-Four” in which negation of the physical world is an integral part of the social and political philosophy of Big Brother and his tyrannical Party. At one stage in the book, Winston stumbles upon the shocking realization that in the end the Party would announce that two plus two made five and,

“…. you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later; the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy.” (“The New Spirituality and its Hallmarks, Alan Morrison, SCP Journal, Vol. 30:4-31:1, 2007, p. 19)

God-men are legion today. They have successfully initiated a devastating assault upon the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the whole body of the Christian church and by extension, upon Western and American society in ways that to previous generations would have seemed unthinkable. The growing ranks of modern Western and Eastern god-men include notables such Auguste Comte, Nietzsche, Karl Marx, Hegel, Hitler, sundry Indian god-men (i.e., Rajneesh), Teilhard de Chardin, L. Ron Hubbard and Aleister Crowley, for example. Each god-man either established a natural religion such as scientific positivism (Comte) or dialectical materialism (Marx), an occult spiritual philosophy (Crowley), an anti-supernatural scientific and evolutionary “New Christianity” (Teilhard) or powerful diabolical blood cults (Marxism) that have drawn and continue to draw souls to their doom since demonized god-men are harvesters of souls for the kingdom of the Evil One.

Aleister Crowley: Founder of Thelema

Thelema is an Eastern influenced occult spiritual philosophy of pantheist monism developed by Crowley, a 20th century British writer, ceremonial magician and Satanist. Pantheist monism asserts the divine-human link:

“All is ultimately One. This doctrine is fundamental to mysticism, both eastern and western. God, man, and the universe are fundamentally one. The Creator-creature distinction, so crucial to orthodox Judaism and Christianity, is specifically denied. The so-called ‘spark of divinity’ in each man supposedly leads all men back into oneness with God (the Universal Force)…. The body, the mind, the soul are one within the physical forces…In each entity there is that portion which is a part of the Universal Force…God is impersonal; only man is truly personal. This is (a) central theme of monist systems. Man is the personal agent of the impersonal God.” (Unholy Spirits: Occultism and New Age Humanism, Gary North, p. 207)

Within the system of pagan and pantheist monism, God is an evolutionary Force or Energy to be scientifically managed; a power to be tapped by initiates and enlightened god-men. This impersonal Force that supposedly drives the universe’s evolutionary destiny was referred to centuries ago in the European magical tradition as the divine Mens, or Mind. It was cosmic in scope and through careful study and practice (occult or magic science) the magician could control and channel its’ power. The ultimate goal was to acquire powerful psychic powers and gnosis through recreation or actualization of the cosmic Mens within the human mind. (1)

In the main, Thelema is based upon a demonic encounter Crowley and his wife had in Egypt in 1904 with a spirit calling itself Aiwass. According to Crowley, Aiwass contacted him and dictated a text known as The Book of the Law or Liber AL vel Legis, which outlined the principles of Thelema.

The Thelemic pantheon focuses primarily on a trinity of horned deities (fallen powers and principalities) adapted from ancient Egyptian pantheist monism. The horned deities are the three speakers of The Book of the Law: Nuit, Hadit and Ra-Hoor-Khuit. The three speakers predicted that the 20th century would mark the ending of the Christian God and Christian theism and the beginning of the Aeon of Horus, an age of apostasy into pantheist monism, creative destruction, and force and fire wrought by demonized god-men and their masses of disciples – a self-absorbed, destructive generation, the followers of a new anti-morality summed up as, “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.”

In “Our Savage God: The Perverse Use of Eastern Thought,” R.C. Zaehner, Spalding professor of comparative religion of Oxford, discusses the monistic (collectivist/oneness) goals of Hinduism and Buddhism and how the Satanist Aleister Crowley applied monistic philosophy to his own ends. Crowley, said Zaehner, belonged to an age-old monistic tradition which saw the Eternal (Supreme Soul, Void, Abyss, Quantum Vacuum) as the ultimate unity in which all opposites were reconciled, including God with man, man with woman, woman with man, good with evil. (2)

Zaehner also discusses Crowley’s attainment of Buddhist “enlightenment,” the results of which were “revised” by his spirit guide “Aiwass.” Having assisted Crowley to go beyond good and evil, Aiwass now taught him indulgence. Aiwass, Crowley’s “Holy Guardian Angel,” taught “him that absolute bliss could only be attained by enjoying the good things of this world to the full – riches, power, and above all sex, the earthly counterpart of the transcendent union of the opposite.” (ibid)

As a result, Crowley partook of tantric kundalini sex-magic rites ostensibly for “spiritual” ends. His “Ordo Templi Orientalis” (Order of the Oriental Temple or O.T.O.) became a branch of Western Tantra. Indeed, Crowley seems to have been the principal agent responsible for introducing the perversion of Eastern sex magic to the West. In a text entitled “Yoga: Immortality and Freedom,” the yoga authority and University of Chicago professor Mircea Eliade discusses the amoral orientation of Tantra:

The tantric texts frequently repeat the saying, “By the same acts that cause some men to burn in hell…the yogin gains his eternal salvation.” This…is the foundation stone of the Yoga expounded by Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita (XVIII, 17). “He who has no feeling of egoism, and whose mind is not tainted, even though he kills (all) these people, kills not, is not fettered (by the action).”  “And the Brhadaranyaka Upanishad (V,14, 8) had already said: “One who knows this, although he commits very much evil, consumes it all and becomes clean and pure, ageless and immortal.” (ibid)

In addition to his spirit-guide Aiwass, another important mentor of Crowley’s was the Christian apostate Friedrich Nietzsche, the German philosopher who declared the death of the Christian God and called himself the Anti-Christ:

The greatest recent event – that ‘God is dead,’ that the belief in the Christian God has ceased to be believable – is even now beginning to cast its first shadows over Europe; however, few really understood ” what has really happened here, “and what must collapse now that this belief has been undermined – all that was built upon it, leaned on it, grew into it; for example, our whole European morality.” (False Dawn, Lee Penn, p. 433)

Nietzsche argued for the nonexistence of the Christian God as follows:

“I will now disprove the existence of all gods. If there were gods, how could I bear not to be a god? Consequently, there are no gods.” (3)

Each major book of Nietzsche’s is an attack on the Christian God and Christian faith. The central axis of Nietzsche’s philosophy is always the same – he is as centered on Jesus Christ as Augustine was, only he centered on Christ as his enemy.

With “Ecce Homo” Nietzsche willingly embraces lies and dark fantasy while in “The Genealogy of Morals” he claims that Biblical morality was invented by the “weak,” meaning the Jews and then the Christians, to weaken the strong. Thus sheep convinced wolves to act like sheep, and this is unnatural, argued the Anti-Christ who embraced delusions such as “‘Whoever must be a creator always annihilates’ (4)

Creation and destruction are as inseparable to Aiwass as to Nietzsche’s evil spirit guide Zarathustra: the creator must always destroy. Thus it follows that a new world order is always preceded by the destruction of the old, hated order:

The man who breaks… tables of values, the breaker, the lawbreaker; …he is the creator.”(Nietzsche)

One of the central ideas taught by Zarathustra is that since ‘self’ is self-evolved then the disciple must take responsibility for who or what he is and for creating himself and his own laws as transgenders do today. The implication of this idea is that the old ‘self’ must be destroyed in order to make way for the new ‘self’:

‘You must wish to consume yourself in your own flame: how could you wish to become new unless you had first become ashes!’ (Nietzsche)

The aftermath of the destruction of ‘self’ is insanity followed by possession. This is experienced by power yogis when kundalini current finally reaches full voltage with the result that the so-called Soul of the Universe supposedly occupies the body but is in fact an ancient evil spirit possessing the body of the ‘god-man:’

The moment of power transfer had come….Muktananda (adept of Nityananda) was about to make the timeless journey…. of the power yogi (the Siddha), but it required the catalytic power of the master guru, Nityananda…who was God to Muktananda, therefore worthy of worship as the supreme Deity. The voyage of consciousness, prized by the ancients, would split Muktananda into fragments…Sometimes (his) body would writhe and twist like a snake’s while a hissing sound would come from inside (him).” Finally it happened – Explosion, the point of no return where Muktananda “as an individual would be obliterated. Superconscious states would take control of him, and his consciousness would be kicked out to more and more remote levels.” “In place of the former person was the walking void, the Unself, the hollow shell filled with the soul of the universe…” (Riders of the Cosmic Circuit, Tal Brooke, pp. 36-45)

In “Beyond Good and Evil” the Anti-Christ presents his “Master morality,” the anti-morality summarized by Crowley as “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.” What this means is that since demonized God-hating liars have conceptually “murdered” the Holy Triune God and sealed up heaven, Masters have a natural right to do whatever they please, for everything is permissible. Whatever a Master commands becomes good from the mere fact that the Master wills it:

Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” “At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.” (‘Paedophilia is natural and normal for males,’ Andrew Gilligan, telegraph.co.uk, Jul 2014)

“The Twilight of the Idols” explores the consequences of the murder of the Christian God. With His death is liberation from the supernatural Mind, Authority and Will that has transcended the mind and will of man who is now god and decrees the death of eternally existing Truth, Moral Absolutes, sin and agape love. With the murder of the Triune God, there will no longer be a heaven for the sheep since all of these “idols” will die now that loveless god-men have murdered the Holy Triune God. (Rev. 4)

Who will replace the murdered Triune God? The Superman, the new Master of the Universe. Nietzsche’s masterpiece, “Thus Spake Zarathustra,” celebrates this new god. Nietzsche called Zarathustra the new anti-Gospel and told the world to “throw away all other books; you have my Zarathustra.”

The Anti-Christ

Among contemporary intelligentsia and global ‘god-men’ (Globalists, Trans-Humanists and other practitioners of the magic way) intent upon ushering in a worldwide Scientific Dictatorship – a sustainable green pagan heaven (hell) on earth created by Masters for Masters – one of the most widely-read and acclaimed thinkers today is Friedrich Nietzsche, the Anti-Christ. Many twentieth century totalitarians were disciples of Nietzsche, including America’s Progressive Left and Hitler.

In “The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich,” William Shirer recounts Hitler’s frequent sojourns to the Nietzsche museum in Weimar. Commenting on Hitler’s veneration for Nietzsche, Shirer writes:

There was some ground for this appropriation of Nietzsche as one of the originators of the Nazi Weltanschauung. Had not the philosopher thundered against democracy and parliaments, preached the will to power, praised war and proclaimed the coming of the master race and the superman – and in the most telling aphorisms? (Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, 1959)

Though Nietzsche harshly criticized socialism, his evolutionary thinking and monist (collectivist) political and social thoughts harmonized well with Marxism.

In “Nietzsche: A Precursor to Hitler?” researcher Phillip D. Collins writes that in addition to the continuity of pagan political and social thought that pervaded totalitarian socialism, Nietzsche also provided a religious component. The infamous declaration, “God is dead,” is but a segue for the introduction of the horned goat-deity Baphomet – a new Babylonian god merged with mystical Eastern pantheism. This god of evolutionary forces has had, and continues to have, numerous manifestations, as is evidenced by the following delineation by W. Warren Wagar:

Nineteenth-and early twentieth-century thought teems with time-bound emergent deities. Scores of thinkers preached some sort of faith in what is potential in time, in place of the traditional Christian and mystical faith in a power outside of time. Hegel’s Weltgeist, Comte’s Humanite, Spencer’s organismic humanity inevitably improving itself by the laws of evolution, Nietzsche’s doctrine of superhumanity, the conception of a finite God given currency by J.S. Mill, Hastings Rashdall, and William James, the vitalism of Bergson and Shaw, the emergent evolutionism of Samuel Alexander and Lloyd Morgan, the theories of divine immanence in the liberal movement in Protestant theology, and du Nouy’s telefinalism – all are exhibits in evidence of the influence chiefly of evolutionary thinking, both before and after Darwin, in Western intellectual history. The faith of progress itself – especially the idea of progress as built into the evolutionary scheme of things – is in every way the psychological equivalent of religion.” (Wagar, 106 -07)

Nietzsche’s self-evolved Superman was but one more link in an ideational chain connecting revolutionaries such as Hegel, Comte, Marx, Stalin, Hitler, Crowley, and contemporary New World Order Masters of the Universe. The central theme is a pagan and pantheist religious faith in humanity’s evolutionary ascent towards godhood. Collins writes that this is by no means new:

This doctrine of transformism dates back nearly 6,000 years, finding its crucible in Mesopotamia. It was the religious doctrine promulgated by the ancient Babylonian and Egyptian Mystery cults.”

Masonic scholar W.L. Wilmshurst verifies this contention:

This – the evolution of man into superman – was always the purpose of the ancient Mysteries” (The Meaning of Masonry. New York: Gramercy, 1980)

Nietzsche’s Superman represents a pinnacle of biological and spiritual evolution. At the apex of anti-creation, anti-human evolutionary process, Superman would “overcome” his own fleshly humanity – his mortality, his conscience, human weaknesses and limitations. Just as this post-human condition represented godhood for ancient Mystery Religion initiates, so it represents godhood for Nietzsche, Hitler, Crowley, inner circle Masons, contemporary Transhumanists, Spiritual Transhumanists, occult New Agers and their apostate New Christian counterparts who are even now rewriting the Bible so it will reflect evolutionary and pagan thinking.

Inherent in this ancient evolutionary creed are Western pagan, Eastern pantheist, and neo-Gnostic teachings that the fall of soul into the material realm was either inexplicable or explained as punishment. At any rate it was a plunge from being as one with or an aspect of the Divine Substance into the material realm of distinctions, or binary. The fall then is not into sin as a result of disobedience but rather into matter. Salvation means either reabsorption into the Divine Substance or attainment of godhood by way of an evolutionary process controlled by illumined adepts.

Nietzsche’s Transvaluation of Values

Nietzsche’s version of gnosis resulting from his mystical encounter with Zarathustra, as with Crowley, is the demonic “transvaluation of values” and the enthronement of divinized-self as the final anti-Christ, anti-moral, anti-tradition, authority while earth becomes the divine kingdom of the totalitarian demonized Masters of the Universe.

In a larger context, this means the absolute freedom (license) increasingly exercised by contemporary Western and American god-men and their masses of followers in the name of scientism, evolution, ideology, moral relativism, absolute equality, open-minded tolerance and man-made rights (i.e., “gay” marriage, pedophilia) is actually the destructive license which perverts the true meaning and purpose of morally-principled freedom. Absolute freedom enslaves god-men and their followers to their dark side, or sin nature, thus leading them into the anarchy of concupiscence and self-gratification issuing in super-inflated pride, hate, envy, vengeance, paranoia, violence, and murder.

The 19th century apocalyptic prophet Fyodor Dostoevsky foresaw the devastating consequences of absolute freedom that would usher in planetary spiritual socialism during the age of demonized god-men.

Out of the surfeit of arrogant conceit, destructive license, and violence exacerbated by blasphemy and unbelief said Dostoevsky, will emerge a new man, a miserable man anxious to be saved from himself and the madness of others, hence ready to surrender his absolute freedom for safety, earthly bread, peace, a soothed conscience and a modicum of comfort derived from sin sanctified by his Masters. (Political Apocalypse, Ellis Sandoz, p. 179)

In this way demonized god-men and their followers will progress from the tyranny of sin and evil spirits to the tyranny of the Man of Lawlessness, the Anti-Christ (2 Thessalonians 2:3), the psychopath par excellence, for out of the shattered,

“… spiritual and social order emerges the new ethic of absolute submission to absolute power.”

So will end the Aeon of Horus with its reign of demonized god-men.

revised 2023@ Linda Kimball

  1. The Making of the New Spirituality: The Eclipse of the Western Tradition, James A. Herrick, p. 258
  2. The Coming Darkness, John Ankerberg and John Weldon, p.113
  3. Peter Kreeft, Pillars of Unbelief – Nietzsche, catholiceducation.org
  4. Creative Destruction in Economics: Nietzsche, Sombart, Schumpeter,” Hugo Reinert, Cambridge University and Erik S. Reinert

7 thoughts on “Teachings of Demons: The Aeon of Horus, Reign of God-Men, and End of the Christian God”

  1. In the interests of simplicity, I would sum it all up as the following:
    All those seeking to be masters of the universe become zombies, like the living dead. They are hollowed – out men with nothing inside them with which they can relate to other men, such as brotherly love. They can’t love anything but themselves, not even reality.
    Any human characteristics such as familial love are missing as well. That’s what makes them truly demonic since they have demonic characteristics and not men’s.
    It appears that only the love of God is what makes us truly human. They don’t have that so they’re something other than human.

  2. In view of the above article, I now understand something I read long ago about the Satanist Anton LeVey’s immoral counsel which was “do as thou wilt”. He likely got that from Aleister Crowley who came before him. Up until now, I’d thought that was his own idea of Satanism.

  3. Linda, I have an admission to make, and that is that I feel somewhat chagrined at times such as now. You see, when I make a comment, it’s with the expectation that I have a new and original take on the subject, something I think wasn’t included in the article. Then if I go back to review the article I find that, yes, it is there!
    My first comment wasn’t that original after all. Hence the chagrin. Your coverage is that good.
    However, I’ll still be looking for a different perspective, if I can find one. Cheers! :>)

    1. LindaKimball

      Whether you find an original take or not, you are a thinking man, in a time when so many are not, and I very much admire thinking people.

      1. I’m nor sure how to respond to that. I’ve never thought of myself in those terms, given my checkered educational past. My formal education ended in 1977, 46 years ago, without a degree since that wasn’t even my goal for attending Jr. College. My education was checkered before that too, which is why.
        My family were not thinkers, just everyday mundane wage earners and I thought like them too. I sometimes noticed what seemed like an unusual ability that I had, which is what you see here. I didn’t graduate from High School but I made a 97 percentile score on my GED, which qualified me to enroll in colleges.
        So I’m unfamiliar and somewhat uncomfortable with this new role as a thinker . But rest assured, I’m giving it my best shot.
        P.S. I also became the “religious” one.

  4. Gene Kronberg

    >”… the theories of divine immanence in the liberal movement in Protestant theology,…”
    Did a search for “divine immanence”
    Summarizer
    “Divine immanence refers to God’s kingly control and authority, which is present throughout the whole creation, especially to his people, in a personal and covenantal way….2 Immanence is a term used in philosophy and theology to describe the fact or condition of being entirely within something. Its most important use is for the theological conception of God as existing in and throughout the created world, as opposed to deism, which conceives him as separate from and above the universe.3 In the Christian faith, divine immanence complements the divine transcendence, as God remains God and is neither part of the world nor is perfected by the world.”
    ———
    thegospelcoalition.org
    › essay › divine-transcendence-immanence
    January 15, 2020 – Divine immanence is the description of his kingly control and authority; because he rules over creation, he is present throughout the whole creation, especially to his people, in a personal and covenantal way. Rather than describing God in an impersonal way, the doctrines of transcendence and immanence describe the royal dignity and presence of the God who came to be among his people in Jesus Christ, Immanuel, God with us.
    ————-
    I do not see this “divine immanence” as being contrary to either Scripture or Reform Protestantism.

Comments are closed.